←  Paediatrics

PAEDIATRIC JOURNAL CLUB · TRIAL PROTOCOL

OM-85 to prevent readmission in preschool wheeze (ARROW)

Costa-Pinto JC, van Arragon M, Lee KJ, et al; CIRCAN Investigator Group. J Paediatr Child Health. 2026;62:1244-1254. doi:10.1111/jpc.70434. A published protocol for a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PROTOCOL: OM-85
FOR PRESCHOOL
WHEEZE
STUDY AT A GLANCE
Clinical question
In young children admitted with preschool wheeze, does the oral bacterial lysate OM-85 reduce hospital admissions for wheeze over the next 12 months?
Design
Decentralised phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across Australia and New Zealand.
Setting
40+ hospitals in the CIRCAN network; enrolment, randomisation and follow-up run centrally and largely remotely.
Population
870 children aged 1 to under 6 years, admitted with preschool wheeze and a history of recurrent wheeze episodes.
Intervention
OM-85 3.5 mg or matching placebo once daily for the first 10 days of each month, for 12 months.
Primary outcome
A hospital admission for an acute wheezing illness during the 12-month treatment period.
Secondary outcomes
Frequency and duration of wheeze episodes, and cost-effectiveness.
Status
A protocol paper. The trial is recruiting and results are not yet available. Registered ACTRN12620001370998.
WHAT IT WILL ANSWER

The question that counts

Whether OM-85 can cut admissions is an outcome prioritised by clinicians, policymakers and families. ARROW is the first adequately sized trial to test it.

Why OM-85

OM-85 is an oral bacterial lysate thought to stimulate antiviral immunity and dampen the airway inflammation that drives viral wheeze.

A real-world endpoint

The primary outcome is a hospital admission for wheeze - robust, clinically meaningful, and verified against hospital records rather than caregiver report.

Powered to change practice

Powered to detect a 25% relative reduction in readmission (the minimum the investigators felt would shift practice); the observed placebo-group rate ran around 33%.

No answer yet

This is a protocol. Read it as a heads-up on evidence to come, not a reason to change what you do now.

WHY THIS MATTERS

  • Acute wheeze is one of the commonest reasons preschoolers are admitted
  • Readmission rates are high - around a third within 12 months in this group
  • There is no well-proven preventive that reduces admissions in this age group
  • Families and clinicians prioritise fewer admissions as the outcome that counts
  • A large, pragmatic Australia and New Zealand trial could directly change practice

STRENGTHS

  • The first trial large enough to answer the admission question
  • A robust, clinically important primary outcome, verified against hospital records
  • A pragmatic, decentralised design that reaches regional and remote families
  • Extensive consumer and end-user engagement from the outset
  • Over 40 sites across Australia and New Zealand, aiding generalisability

LIMITATIONS

  • A protocol only - no efficacy or safety results yet
  • Relies on caregivers to give the medication and record data (though admissions are record-verified)
  • No biological sampling, so mechanism is not explored in this trial
  • The sample size was revised down after a higher-than-expected event rate
  • Generalisability beyond Australasia will need confirmation

How to read this

Preschool wheeze is bread-and-butter paediatrics, and the children who keep coming back are a real burden on families and the system. ARROW is testing whether a monthly course of the oral bacterial lysate OM-85 can reduce those readmissions. For now this is a protocol, so nothing changes in clinic: OM-85 is not a standard preventive for preschool wheeze, and management still rests on getting the acute episode right, reviewing inhaler technique and the action plan, considering a preventive trial where the pattern fits, and addressing smoke exposure and other triggers. The value of reading the protocol now is to understand the question and the design, so that when the results land you can judge them quickly. One to watch.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1

What do you currently offer the preschooler who keeps being readmitted with wheeze?

2

How convincing is a bacterial lysate mechanism for preventing viral wheeze?

3

Is a 25% relative reduction in admissions enough to change your practice?

4

What would you want to see on safety before using OM-85 routinely?

RELATED & REFERENCES
Preschool wheeze
Common, recurrent, and hard to prevent
Paediatrics
Outpatient approaches and clinic tools on the Hub
Trial registration
ANZCTR ACTRN12620001370998
Evidence to come
Results are not yet published - one to watch
RESOURCES
❝

Take-home message: ARROW is a large Australia and New Zealand trial testing whether the oral bacterial lysate OM-85, given 10 days a month for a year, reduces hospital admissions in young children with recurrent preschool wheeze. This is the published protocol, so there are no results yet and nothing changes in practice today - OM-85 is not a standard preventive. It is worth knowing the question and the design now, so the results are easy to judge when they come. One to watch.

For educational purposes only. Journal club appraisal - figures paraphrased from the published trial; read the full article for complete data. Always align practice to your local guidelines.

Enter Password